Grasping Phenomenal Properties

نویسنده

  • Martine Nida-Rümelin
چکیده

1 Grasping Properties I will present an argument for property dualism. The argument employs a distinction between having a concept of a property and grasping a property via a concept. If you grasp a property P via a concept C, then C is a concept of P. But the reverse does not hold: you may have a concept of a property without grasping that property via any concept. If you grasp a property, then your cognitive relation to that property is more intimate then if you just have some concept or other of that property. To grasp a property is to understand what having that property essentially consists in. To have a concept of a property is to have a concept one can use to attribute the property to something. If you have the concept of water then you can use it to attribute the property of being water to liquids. You then have a concept of the property of being water. But you might have the concept of water without knowing that being composed of H 2 0 is essential for being water—without knowing what having the property of being water consists in. In that case, your concept would not enable you to grasp the property. I will propose an account of grasping properties. It is quite easy to find examples where we do not grasp the property at issue. But it might be less obvious that we sometimes do grasp properties via concepts. I think that we sometimes do and that a clear case is provided by our understanding of phenomenal properties via phenomenal concepts. To have a particular phenomenal property is to have an experience of a specific subjective feel. If you have a phenomenal concept of a phenomenal property, then you know what it is to have an experience with that subjective feel. You thereby know what it is to have that property: you grasp the phenomenal property via your phenomenal concept. This idea seems natural. But some work needs to be done to explicate the idea within a theoretical framework that relates concepts and properties. I will call the claim that we can grasp phenomenal properties via phenomenal concepts the thesis of phenomenal essentialism. Phenomenal essentialism may seem to trivially imply property dualism. The property dualist denies that to have a phenomenal property consists in having physical features. This denial may appear to follow directly …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Role of Consciousness in Grasping and Understanding

One sometimes believes that P without grasping that P. For example, a complete achromat might believe that ripe tomatoes are red without grasping this fact. My aim in this paper is to shed light on the difference between merely believing a fact or proposition and grasping it. I focus on two possible theories of grasping: the inferential theory, which explains grasping in terms of inferential ro...

متن کامل

Spontaneous in-flight accommodation of hand orientation to unseen grasp targets: A case of action blindsight.

The division of labour between the dorsal and ventral visual pathways is well established. The ventral stream supports object identification, while the dorsal stream supports online processing of visual information in the service of visually guided actions. Here, we report a case of an individual with a right inferior quadrantanopia who exhibited accurate spontaneous rotation of his wrist when ...

متن کامل

Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action.

Research has illustrated dissociations between "cognitive" and "action" systems, suggesting that different representations may underlie phenomenal experience and visuomotor behavior. However, these systems also interact. The present studies show a necessary interaction when semantic processing of an object is required for an appropriate action. Experiment 1 demonstrated that a semantic task int...

متن کامل

Talking about Looks

In natural language, looks-talk is used in a variety of ways. I investigate three uses of 'looks' that have traditionally been distinguished - epistemic, comparative, and phenomenal 'looks' - and endorse and develop considerations in support of the view that these amount to polysemy. Focusing on the phenomenal use of 'looks', I then investigate connections between its semantics, the content of ...

متن کامل

The Phenomenal Content of Experience

We discuss in some length evidence from the cognitive science suggesting that the representations of objects based on spatiotemporal information and featural information retrieved bottom-up from a visual scene precede representations of objects that include conceptual information. We argue that a distinction can be drawn between representations with conceptual and nonconceptual content. The dis...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006